Governing the Autonomous Enterprise with ServiceNow AI

Authors

  • Dileep Valiki Author

Keywords:

SAI Governance Frameworks, Cloud-Native AI Systems, Security-Centric Automation, ServiceNow AI Integration, Zero-Trust Architecture, AI Risk Management, Compliance-Driven AI Operations, Identity and Access Control, AI Lifecycle Governance, Secure AI Deployment.

Abstract

Enterprises are increasingly embracing Artificial Intelligence (AI) to accelerate business outcomes. However, deploying AI technology responsibly requires a controlled environment with appropriate risk management to ensure the long-term viability of these systems. This calls for an AI governance framework aligned with enterprise service delivery, one capable of detecting and remediating trust, safety, security, and compliance risks across the AI lifecycle — including the data used to train, develop, and operate AI models.

To this end, we present a Cloud-Native, Security-Centric, and Compliant AI-Driven Automation Framework for ServiceNow. The framework enables AI services to be developed, operated, and maintained safely, securely, and in a controlled, responsive manner consistent with AI governance principles throughout their lifecycle. It operates within a cloud-native model, with all constituent applications — spanning SaaS, IaaS, and PaaS — developed and deployed under zero-trust principles and least-privilege identity and access management. Together, these elements establish a foundation for continuously strengthening security-centric and compliance controls.

References

1. Almeida, P. G. R., & Santos Júnior, C. D. (2024). Artificial intelligence governance: Understanding how public organizations implement it. Government Information Quarterly, 41(3), 101003.

2. Berente, N., Gu, B., Recker, J., & Santhanam, R. (2021). Managing artificial intelligence. MIS Quarterly, 45(3), 1433–1450.

3. Birkstedt, T., Minkkinen, M., Tandon, A., & Mäntymäki, M. (2023). AI governance: Themes, knowledge gaps and future agendas. Internet Research, 33(7), 133–167.

4. Yandamuri, U. S. (2024). AI-Driven Decision Support Systems for Operational Optimization in Hospitality Technology. Metallurgical and Materials Engineering.

5. Dong, W. (2022). AIOps architecture in data center site infrastructure monitoring. Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience, 2022, Article 1988990.

6. Dwivedi, Y. K., Hughes, L., Ismagilova, E., Aarts, G., Coombs, C., Crick, T., Duan, Y., Dwivedi, R., Edwards, J., Eirug, A., Galanos, V., Ilavarasan, P. V., Janssen, M., Jones, P., Kar, A. K., Kizgin, H., Kronemann, B., Lal, B., Lucini, B., Medaglia, R., et al. (2021). Artificial intelligence (AI): Multidisciplinary perspectives on emerging challenges, opportunities, and agenda for research, practice and policy. International Journal of Information Management, 57, 101994.

7. Enholm, I. M., Papagiannidis, E., Mikalef, P., & Krogstie, J. (2022). Artificial intelligence and business value: A literature review. Information Systems Frontiers, 24(5), 1709–1734.

8. Jöhnk, J., Weißert, M., & Wyrtki, K. (2021). Ready or not, AI comes—An interview study of organizational AI readiness factors. Business & Information Systems Engineering, 63(1), 5–20.

9. Lahusen, C., Maggetti, M., & Slavkovik, M. (2024). Trust, trustworthiness and AI governance. Scientific Reports, 14, Article 20752.

10. Mikalef, P., & Gupta, M. (2021). Artificial intelligence capability: Conceptualization, measurement calibration, and empirical study on its impact on organizational creativity and firm performance. Information & Management, 58(3), 103434.

11. Kolla, S. K., & Mangalampalli, B. M. (2024). Edge-Based Deep Learning Systems for Point-of-Care Diagnostic Intelligence. Journal of Neonatal Surgery, 13(1), 2387-2399.

12. Mäntymäki, M., Minkkinen, M., Birkstedt, T., & Viljanen, M. (2022). Defining organizational AI governance. AI and Ethics, 2, 603–609.

13. Morley, J., Elhalal, A., Garcia, F., Kinsey, L., Mökander, J., & Floridi, L. (2021). Ethics as a service: A pragmatic operationalisation of AI ethics. Minds and Machines, 31, 239–256.

14. Morley, J., Kinsey, L., Elhalal, A., Garcia, F., Ziosi, M., & Floridi, L. (2023). Operationalising AI ethics: Barriers, enablers and next steps. AI & Society, 38, 411–423.

15. Papagiannidis, E., Enholm, I. M., Dremel, C., Mikalef, P., & Krogstie, J. (2023). Toward AI governance: Identifying best practices and potential barriers and outcomes. Information Systems Frontiers, 25, 123–141.

16. Raisch, S., & Krakowski, S. (2021). Artificial intelligence and management: The automation–augmentation paradox. Academy of Management Review, 46(1), 192–210.

17. Spring, M., Faulconbridge, J., & Sarangi, S. (2022). How information technology automates and augments processes: Insights from artificial-intelligence-based systems in professional service operations. Journal of Operations Management, 68(6–7), 592–618.

18. Zuiderwijk, A., Chen, Y.-C., & Salem, F. (2021). Implications of the use of artificial intelligence in public governance: A systematic literature review and a research agenda. Government Information Quarterly, 38(3), 101577.

19. Mangala, N. (2024). Leveraging Microsoft Fabric lakehouse as an AI-ready data platform for enterprise analytics. Journal of Information Systems Engineering and Management.

20. Ahmad, T., Zhang, D., Huang, C., Zhang, H., Dai, N., Song, Y., & Chen, H. (2021). Artificial intelligence in sustainable energy industry: Status quo, challenges, and opportunities. Journal of Cleaner Production, 289, 125834.

21. Chatila, R., Dignum, V., Fisher, M., Giampapa, J., Kheddar, A., & Seifert, C. (2021). Trustworthy AI and robotics. In E. Y. Nakashima, A. Dubois, & M. D. G. et al. (Eds.), Ethics in artificial intelligence and robotics. Springer.

22. Shin, D. (2021). The effects of explainability and causability on perception, trust, and acceptance: Implications for explainable AI. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 146, 102551.

23. Köchling, A., & Wehner, M. C. (2021). Discriminated by an algorithm: A systematic review of discrimination and fairness by algorithmic decision-making in the context of HR recruitment and HR development. Business Research, 13, 795–848.

24. Laato, S., Islam, A. K. M. N., Islam, M. N., & Whelan, E. (2022). What drives unverified information sharing and cyberchondria during the COVID-19 pandemic? European Journal of Information Systems, 31(1), 1–24.

25. Minkkinen, M., Laakso, M., & Mäntymäki, M. (2022). Identifying and understanding organizational AI governance practices. AI and Ethics, 2, 1–15.

26. Reddy, S., Allan, S., Coghlan, S., & Cooper, P. (2021). A governance model for the application of AI in health care. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 27(3), 491–497.

27. Schneider, S., Meske, C., & Kessler, S. (2022). Artificial intelligence governance: A systematic literature review. Business & Information Systems Engineering, 64, 1–20.

28. Theodorou, A., & Dignum, V. (2020). Towards ethical and socio-legal governance in AI. Nature Machine Intelligence, 2, 10–12.

29. Wu, Y., Zhang, Y., & Chen, X. (2022). Explainable artificial intelligence for trustworthy decision-making in organizations. Decision Support Systems, 155, 113706.

30. Li, B., Qi, P., Liu, B., Di, S., Liu, J., Pei, J., Yi, J., & Zhou, B. (2023). Trustworthy AI: From principles to practices. ACM Computing Surveys, 55(9), 1–46.

31. Ahmed, S., Singh, M., Doherty, B., Ramlan, E., Harkin, K., Bucholc, M., & Coyle, D. (2023). Knowledge-based intelligent system for IT incident DevOps. In Proceedings of the 2023 IEEE/ACM International Workshop on Cloud Intelligence and AIOps (pp. 1–7).

32. Li, Y., Zhang, X., He, S., Chen, Z., Kang, Y., Liu, J., Li, L., Dang, Y., Gao, F., Xu, Z., Rajmohan, S., Lin, Q., Zhang, D., & Lyu, M. R. (2022). An intelligent framework for timely, accurate, and comprehensive cloud incident detection. ACM SIGOPS Operating Systems Review, 56(1), 1–7.

33. Kumar, S., & Laxmi, K. R. (2022). Predictive analytics in IT service management (ITSM). In Data mining and machine learning applications. Wiley.

34. Wu, Y., Ge, J., & Li, T. (2022). Intelligent network management and operation systems. In AI and machine learning for network and security management. Wiley.

35. Mangalampalli, B. M. (2024). AI-Enhanced Data Governance: Automating Compliance In Healthcare Analytics Platforms. The Review Of DIABETIC STUDIES OPEN ACCESS.

36. Gudala, L. (2024). AIOps in action: Streamlining IT operations through artificial intelligence. International Journal of Intelligent Systems and Applications in Engineering, 12(23s), 2175–2185.

37. Rêgo de Almeida, P. G., & Santos Júnior, C. D. (2024). Artificial intelligence governance: Understanding how public organizations implement it. Government Information Quarterly, 41(3), 101003.

38. Roberts, H., Cowls, J., Hine, E., & Floridi, L. (2024). Global AI governance: Barriers and pathways forward. International Affairs, 100(3), 1275–1286.

39. Khot, S., Waghre, A. R., Abbas, M. H., & Zubair, M. (2024). Digital transformation of utility services using AI, IoT and ITSM practices: Evidence from water, electricity and waste management systems. Journal of Information Systems Engineering and Management, 9(4).

Additional Files

Published

2025-11-19

Data Availability Statement

The datasets used in this study are described in Table 4 (ServiceNow ITSM logs, IAM audit logs, compliance audit trail, and AI model telemetry). The data are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

How to Cite

Governing the Autonomous Enterprise with ServiceNow AI. (2025). American Advanced Journal for Emerging Disciplinaries (AAJED), 3(04). https://ajeed.org/index.php/ajeedjournal/article/view/50