Quantum AI for Strategic Diplomac
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20570558Keywords:
Strategic Intelligence Forecasting, Empirical Analysis, Predictive Modeling, Artificial Intelligence Fusion Models, Machine Learning Methods, Deep Learning Techniques, Natural Language Processing, Generative Adversarial Models, Multi-Dimensional AI, Real-Time Data Processing, Sensor Data Fusion, Heterogeneous Information Analysis, Intelligent Decision Support, Spatiotemporal Prediction, Forecast Uncertainty Reduction, Natural LanguageAbstract
Strategic intelligence remains a foundational aspect of organized governance and effective policies. Empirical analysis and predictive models have long been recognized as promising for improving the forecasting accuracy and reliability of strategic intelligence. Additionally, recent advances in natural language processing and generative adversarial models provide exciting opportunities for developing innovative fusion models that combine the advantages of both empirical analysis and predictive models. Such models exploit the strengths of machine learning and deep learning methods to learn complex patterns from large amounts of data without requiring domain knowledge or the specification of feature functions. Utilizing multi-dimensional artificial intelligence, these fusion models are capable of real-time processing and analysis of information and sensor monitoring, data mining and analysis of sensors and heterogeneous information in management systems, intelligent decision analysis, and prediction across time and space dimensions.
The interaction of empirical data and prediction provides a qualitative and quantitative basis for the prediction of strategic intelligence. Through fusing the forecasts of multiple models or experts, forecasting accuracy can be enhanced and the uncertainty narrowed. Natural language generation models enhance the comprehensibility and flexibility of numerical forecasting by converting prediction results into natural language, while generative models promote the generation of original data at low cost for various applications such as predicting financial distress. The development of natural language analysis models also makes it possible to process informal data, enabling the detection of potential crises as well as the identification of factors influencing future events and their predictive effects. These advances create the potential for strategic intelligence prediction and crisis early warning based on natural text and speech.
References
[1] Preskill, J. (2018). Quantum computing in the NISQ era and beyond. Quantum, 2, 79.
[2] Bharti, K., Cervera-Lierta, A., Kyaw, T. H., et al. (2022). Noisy intermediate-scale quantum algorithms. Reviews of Modern Physics, 94(1), 015004.
[3] Biamonte, J., Wittek, P., Pancotti, N., et al. (2017). Quantum machine learning. Nature, 549(7671), 195–202.
[4] Schuld, M., Sinayskiy, I., & Petruccione, F. (2015). An introduction to quantum machine learning. Contemporary Physics, 56(2), 172–185.
[5] Ciliberto, C., Herbster, M., Ialongo, A. D., et al. (2018). Quantum machine learning. Proceedings of the Royal Society A, 474(2209), 20170551.
[6] Arute, F., Arya, K., Babbush, R., et al. (2019). Quantum supremacy using a programmable superconducting processor. Nature, 574(7779), 505–510.
[7] Harrow, A. W., & Montanaro, A. (2017). Quantum computational supremacy. Nature, 549(7671), 203–209.
[8] Daley, A. J. (2022). Quantum trajectories and open many-body quantum systems. Advances in Physics, 63(2), 77–149.
[9] Nielsen, M. A., & Chuang, I. L. (2010). Quantum computation and quantum information. Cambridge University Press.
[10] Lloyd, S. (2018). Quantum computing for machine learning. Annual Review of Computer Science, 1, 1–22.
[11] Russell, S., & Norvig, P. (2021). Artificial intelligence: A modern approach (4th ed.). Pearson.
[12] Jordan, M. I., & Mitchell, T. M. (2015). Machine learning: Trends, perspectives, and prospects. Science, 349(6245), 255–260.
[13] Shrestha, Y. R., Ben-Menahem, S. M., & von Krogh, G. (2019). Organizational decision-making structures in the age of AI. California Management Review, 61(4), 66–83.
[14] Davenport, T. H., & Mittal, N. (2022). How generative AI is changing knowledge work. Harvard Business Review, 100(6), 101–109.
[15] Floridi, L., Cowls, J., King, T. C., & Taddeo, M. (2020). How to design AI for social good. Science and Engineering Ethics, 26(3), 1771–1796.
[16] Mittelstadt, B., Russell, C., & Wachter, S. (2019). Explaining explanations in AI. Proceedings of the Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, 279–288.
[17] Nye, J. S. (2017). Deterrence and dissuasion in cyberspace. International Security, 41(3), 44–71.
[18] Gartzke, E., & Lindsay, J. R. (2019). Weaving tangled webs: Offense, defense, and deception in cyberspace. Security Studies, 28(2), 316–348.
[19] Buchanan, B. (2020). The hacker and the state. Harvard University Press.
[20] Kello, L. (2017). The virtual weapon and international order. Yale University Press.
[21] Axelrod, R., & Cohen, M. D. (2000). Harnessing complexity. Free Press.
[22] Wooldridge, M. (2020). An introduction to multiagent systems (2nd ed.). Wiley.
[23] Dorri, A., Kanhere, S. S., & Jurdak, R. (2020). Multi-agent systems: A survey. IEEE Access, 8, 28573–28593.
[24] van der Aalst, W. M. P. (2021). Process mining: Data science in action (2nd ed.). Springer.
[25] Bishop, C. M. (2006). Pattern recognition and machine learning. Springer.
[26] Pearl, J., & Mackenzie, D. (2018). The book of why. Basic Books.
[27] National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. (2019). Quantum computing: Progress and prospects. National Academies Press.
[28] Acín, A., Bloch, I., Buhrman, H., et al. (2018). The quantum technologies roadmap. New Journal of Physics, 20(8), 080201.
[29] Herr, T., Laudrain, A., & de Spiegeleire, S. (2021). Cyber deterrence revisited. Journal of Cyber Policy, 6(1), 1–24.
[30] Taddeo, M., & Floridi, L. (2018). Regulate artificial intelligence to avert cyber arms race. Nature, 556(7701), 296–298.
[31] Silver, D., Singh, S., Precup, D., & Sutton, R. S. (2021). Reward is enough. Artificial Intelligence, 299, 103535.
[32] Sutton, R. S., & Barto, A. G. (2020). Reinforcement learning: An introduction (2nd ed.). MIT Press.
[33] Puranam, P., Cooney, J., & Vaaler, P. (2023). Algorithms and organizational design. Academy of Management Annals, 17(1), 1–40.
[34] Gündüz, D., Ye, J., & Zappone, A. (2023). Learning and decision making under uncertainty. Proceedings of the IEEE, 111(2), 265–302.
[35] Marcus, G., & Davis, E. (2020). Rebooting AI: Building artificial intelligence we can trust. Pantheon Books.
Additional Files
Published
Data Availability Statement
None
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0). Authors retain full copyright of their published work. Under this license, others are free to share, copy, distribute, transmit, remix, transform, and build upon the published work for any purpose, including commercial use, provided that appropriate credit is given to the original authors, a link to the license is provided, and any changes made are clearly indicated. No additional restrictions may be applied that limit others from doing anything the license permits. All published articles are freely and permanently accessible online to readers worldwide without any subscription or access fees.
License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
